Recent Posts

Benefits Challenge

Question:New guidance was recently issued on the Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) under the Affordable Care Act. Which of the following is a required change to the SBC?
Submit

Supreme Court Grants Petitions on Same-Sex Marriage

12/7/2012  9:45AM

ACA/Health Care Reform | Cafeteria Plans/Flexible Benefits

On Friday, December 7, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a petition challenging the federal definition of marriage under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), opening the door to a possible acceptance of same-sex marriage.

The high court granted the petition in the case of Windsor vs. United States. Oral arguments are likely to occur sometime in March 2013 with a decision expected in June 2013. A total of eight petitions were pending before the court on the DOMA issue.rings

Specifically, the Supreme Court will examine Section 3 of DOMA, which states that “the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.” If DOMA becomes invalid, the effects would be sweeping for HR, benefits and insurance professionals, changing rules for laws like COBRA/USERRA, ERISA, payroll, cafeteria plans and flexible benefits, FMLA and federal programs like Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, as well as income tax filings.

In the November elections, Maine, Maryland and Washington voted to legalize same-sex marriage, bringing the total to nine states (CT, IA, MA, NH, NY, VT are the others) and the District of Columbia that have approved same-sex marriage. Some 31 states have amended their constitutions to prohibit same-sex marriage.

California is in a category by itself. It recognizes same-sex marriages performed between June 16, 2008, and November 4, 2008, when same-sex marriage was legal. A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion invalidated Proposition 8, which declared that marriage was only between a man and a woman. That case, Hollingsworth v. Perry, is also pending before the Supreme Court, as are two other state law cases for Arizona and Nevada. The Supreme Court accepted the petition for the California case.

What is your reaction? Do you think DOMA will be upheld or struck down? Please comment below.

-

Add comment

While we value your thoughtful opinions and encourage your comments, Infinisource reserves the right to delete questionable matters, factual errors, obscenities and insults and/or to decline comments that are off topic.




biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



Comments (15) -

Will Pelant
12/7/2012 4:16:25 PM #

I am of the opinion that, given the precedent Internationally as well as with states legalizing same-sex unions that the Supreme Court will have no choice but to strike down DOMA.  I am certain that the final ruling will include language to protect religious freedom much like it has done regarding the issue of Abortion.  Striking down DOMA would definitely be a huge win for our employees in same sex relationships:  Federal Taxes (currently, employees must pay federal taxes on the Company premium paid portion), COBRA options, FSA, etc.  Striking down DOMA is right and fair and it is time.

Reply

Martha
12/7/2012 6:19:27 PM #

I agree with you, Will. It seems unlikely that it will be upheld given the current tide.

Reply

Donna Humphrey
12/7/2012 4:26:56 PM #

Hopefully, upheld!

Reply

Newsroom
12/7/2012 4:32:14 PM #

Thanks Will and Donna for your comments

Reply

Jaci
12/7/2012 4:51:09 PM #

If it pass, for sure will be a burden to the employers. Many companies are hardly surviving through this tough economy. Unfortunately it seems that the Supreme Court is loosing the main reason they are there for. These specific groups (interested on the same sex marriage) should just assume their responsibilities for their own choices and pay for their own benefits and not have to have everyone pay for it. This request doesn't seem fair at all.

Reply

Kim
12/7/2012 5:16:38 PM #

We are redefining marriage. Until recently the word itself meant a contractual union of one man and one woman. Now, it can mean essentially anything. The movement has successfully debased the meaning and we have forgotten why we should have intact families where there is a man and a woman to nuture both genders of children wholistically. The question becomes whether or not if this rules, will the gay rights movement let those that believe otherwise have the right to express their concerns and beliefs. This is where I have a problem with it.
I have long felt that this is more about politics than anything else.

Reply

Donna 2
12/8/2012 1:10:35 PM #

Hopefully, upheld also!

Reply

Sandy
12/10/2012 10:03:58 AM #

Hopefully, upheld!!
Jaci and Kim have some excellent points.

Reply

Sheila
12/10/2012 10:27:31 AM #

Hopefully DOMA is upheld.  Marriage has already been defined and should not be changed.  The same-sex topic has generated much concern for HR already.  This has given opposite-sex couples the idea to avoid their legal option of marriage so they can collect other benefits available to them as "single people".  Now they want to put their opposite-sex partner on employer benefits too, without marriage.  It is really hard to know for sure when the relationship ends since there is nothing legal binding them.  Where's the qualifying event to add and delete members from the insurance plans?    

Reply

Bob
12/10/2012 2:38:59 PM #

Marriage is by definition a union between one man and one woman.  Anything else is, something else !!  

Reply

Tonya
12/11/2012 8:36:20 AM #

I believe that it is wrong and why should we be forced to accept something that is not biblical?

Reply

Bobby
12/11/2012 12:30:10 PM #

The pendilum of morality swings from side to side.  People often change their standards to justify their conduct.  God created the world (I realize this could be argued as well) with certain laws of nature that never change, such as gravity.  There are also biological laws that have yet to change, one being that it takes a man and woman to concieve a child.  And only a woman to birth this child.  Having written all of this, confirms to me that man is not the standard bearer, that God is.  Man willing to justify their behavior will not change the laws of gravity or reproduction.  If we were able to change those, we will have a lot bigger problems than whose rights are being hindered.  The law needs to be upheld.

Reply

LCH
12/25/2012 9:41:59 PM #

Of course the DOMA should be struck down.

Reply

LCH
12/25/2012 9:47:06 PM #

the DOMA is a religion inspired bill.  The separation of church and state is sacrosanct.  No one has the right to tell anyone who they share their lives with and whom they love.  allowing he LGBT community equal rights under the law is just the right thing to do.  

Reply

Joy Self
1/10/2013 9:04:01 AM #

While I have a couple friends who are interested in the same sex, I still believe in my heart and sole no matter what your religion that it was meant to be for a man and a woman to unite to form a marriage and carry on the human race.  We cannot change that and should not try to.  If someone chooses to live with someone of the same sex, they can make that choice, but we do not have to call it a marriage, nor change what was meant to be.

Reply